Of jobs and judgments
I was so excited to hear about the promising job offer at a media firm in Burlington Plaza that I dragged KM off with me to that place in Bugis immediately. The lady turned out to be very nice, and was very encouraging and seemed very approving of all that I could do. I naively believed that this would turn out to be a very good job opportunity, particularly as KM would be working with me as well. After the preliminary interview, the lady seemed very approving of my ability to speak and write and type in English and Chinese. She even went as far as to let me look at their invoices so that I could type out some information on it later, saying that she wanted to test my typing speed. She called me over to look at an assistant doing the bookings for advertisement space, almost as if the training for the position would begin immediately. The whole situation gave one the impression of her almost having accepted KM and I for the positions. But she hadn’t yet discussed the terms of the employment with KM and I, although we had been waiting there several hours.
She had discussed KM's terms with her before lunch, so when we went for lunch, KM warned me not to accept terms that were too low. KM said that the lady was very shrewd and calculative, and that she could not quite figure her out yet, but overall, the impression that she got left her with an unsettled feeling. I was yet riding happily on a cloud of anticipation, and nothing in the interview had yet triggered any alarm bells. But warned by the terms offered to KM ($6 per hour for the first month and $6.50 per hour for the second month and above), and the remark made by the lady that KM was not to tell me of her own terms because I was to be offered less due to lack of experience, I decided that I would scrutinize all the proposals and offers made to me when the time came for me to discuss my own terms.
The final interview opened with the lady being very approving of the little piece of data entry that I had made for her. A little was said about the time I would start work, and a little more about little bits of stray information. There was an elderly guy with her, who was apparently one of her senior staff. The two of them seemed almost to have concluded the discussion on my employment already, but no mention had yet been made of the terms I was to be employed by. I decided that this was too shady, and launched the subject myself with a: "So, the indicated terms are acceptable?" I had previously indicated $6.50 an hour, a standard market rate for temporary administrative jobs. I hoped with this quasi-offensive move, I could bring her to the subject that she seemed to be shying away from and resolve any potential disagreeableness once and for all. She was temporarily off-guard, but apparently had been thinking over the subject and had reached a decision already. The offer she laid on the table was $600 a month, "as per your previous employment terms". That 'previous employment' was an internship with a law firm, and the common understanding is that an internship pays less because students learn career related stuff during an internship. Here was an administrative job, which looked to have a hefty dose of data entry (the boringest, most tedious and most brainless office job imaginable) thrown in, and it was going for the same rate! This would average about $2-3 an hour, and upon my word, even a cheap job at a café would pay $4.50 at a minimum!
I wanted the job, but even that was a bit too hard to swallow. I tried to turn the conversation towards structuring the terms in an hourly rate, because if they had to offer an hourly rate the clear contrast between $6.50 and $2-3 would be most immediately apparent. Then this elderly guy told me that a fixed monthly rate would 'ensure greater security' which was absolute twigglesquash because the lady had earlier indicated that she wanted me to stay for a fixed term of three months so that all the training they gave would not be wasted. Fair enough, I had thought. But then why would I want the purported greater security of a (low) fixed monthly rate if I was going to stay for a fixed 3 months anyway?
Heaven help us, but that elderly guy was the most fitzwoggling hoodwinker I ever had the misfortune to come across. He tried to dazzle me with some outlandish notion that payment by the hour came with a greater expectation that would involve snagging a certain number of customers per day via telemarketing. Actually, one customer every two hours was the rate he came up with. I think he wanted to make it sound impossible, so that I would happily settle for the monthly rate, but I decided not to try to engage him on the reasonableness of those terms.
I realised that there was no compromise to be made in terms of pay. I was not paying $240 per month to stay in PGP for a fun vacation, or on some idealistic notion of gaining work experience that I need not worry about the bottom line. Business people have their own bottom lines, but this is no less true for (poor) working students who look for temporary jobs.
But in the wake of high indignation comes the sobering weight of many thoughts.
It is a moot point that the offer on those terms was an out-and-out scam, or attempted scam; the question is why they even wanted to take it this far.
There is a possibility that the low offer was a subtle indication that they did not want to hire me for lack of experience instead giving me the chance to reject it myself, but if that was so, they could have told me so straightaway, from the very outset. The fact that they took 4 hours to tell me that they would offer me $600 a month shows that they envisioned employing me, at least. There is also a possibility that they might have wanted to employ KM and not me, but telling me no directly would send the both of us off immediately. But this possibility is rejected for they could have told KM 'yes'’ immediately and me 'no' immediately, and left it up to the decisions of the both of us, as this what things would ultimately come down to.
So we are left with the conclusion that they wanted to employ me, and they wanted to employ me on those ridiculously low terms. The next question is why they wanted to do this, and why they even thought it was possible that I might accept such an offer. It is dreadfully hard to imagine pecuniary motives behind the decision of a media firm to undercut a temp worker some $300-400 a month-- it would hardly make a difference to their bottom line. There was lots of work flowing in and out and they were actively hiring several temp staff to help with the workload. Thus, they probably did not do this because they were hard up for money. Did they then do this because that lady, being a shrewd businesswoman, saw that I was a naive, innocent and inexperienced student and thought that this was a great opportunity to undercut someone who would probably take it very happily? Did she think that I was born yesterday? I wouldn’t put it pass her. As to how they thought it possible that I would take it sitting down, I have two surmises: 1) I had clearly written on the form that my previous pay was such an amount and maybe she thought that I had a really low threshold and would accept pay on such measly terms. On that matter, I later made it very clear to her that an internship was related to my studies and it was obtained through the school, two things that the offered job was not. 2) I had shown too much frank eagerness for the job and too enthusiastic a willingness to take it up and 'learn from the experience' and would thus be less concerned about the pay and could safely be offered what was clearly way below what she was prepared to pay. If this was a factor in her consideration, that is plainly despicable and borders on the fraudulent.
On this matter, I have two things to say: 1) I decline to be a fluffy white sheep and bleat contentedly while my hide is skinned off me. 2) May this and every such experience sink into my heart and form the bedrock of suspicion on which I shall judge all such situations in future.
KM tells me that various things that were said to her in her interview, as well as how she feels about that lady, as well as how I was treated, have combined to make the prospect of her own job rather distasteful to her. KM says the claustrophobic office environment also does not help matters. KM says that although the prospect of the pay and the steady job for 4 months is very welcome, she has no guarantee that they will treat her in good faith. KM later called them and rejected her own offer that had been left standing. KM is a darling and deserves three cheers and a hug.
"Fret not thyself because of evildoers, neither be thou envious against the workers of iniquity. For they shall soon be cut down like the grass, and wither as the green herb. Trust in the Lord, and do good; so shalt thou dwell in the land, and verily thou shalt be fed... Commit thy way unto the Lord, trust also in him; and he shall bring it to pass. And he shall bring forth thy righteousness as the light, and thy judgment as the noonday... Cease from anger and forsake wrath: fret not thyself in any wise to do evil... The wicked plotteth against the just, and gnasheth upon him with his teeth. The Lord shall laugh at him: for he seeth that his day is coming." Psalm 37:1-3, 5-6, 8, 12-13
She had discussed KM's terms with her before lunch, so when we went for lunch, KM warned me not to accept terms that were too low. KM said that the lady was very shrewd and calculative, and that she could not quite figure her out yet, but overall, the impression that she got left her with an unsettled feeling. I was yet riding happily on a cloud of anticipation, and nothing in the interview had yet triggered any alarm bells. But warned by the terms offered to KM ($6 per hour for the first month and $6.50 per hour for the second month and above), and the remark made by the lady that KM was not to tell me of her own terms because I was to be offered less due to lack of experience, I decided that I would scrutinize all the proposals and offers made to me when the time came for me to discuss my own terms.
The final interview opened with the lady being very approving of the little piece of data entry that I had made for her. A little was said about the time I would start work, and a little more about little bits of stray information. There was an elderly guy with her, who was apparently one of her senior staff. The two of them seemed almost to have concluded the discussion on my employment already, but no mention had yet been made of the terms I was to be employed by. I decided that this was too shady, and launched the subject myself with a: "So, the indicated terms are acceptable?" I had previously indicated $6.50 an hour, a standard market rate for temporary administrative jobs. I hoped with this quasi-offensive move, I could bring her to the subject that she seemed to be shying away from and resolve any potential disagreeableness once and for all. She was temporarily off-guard, but apparently had been thinking over the subject and had reached a decision already. The offer she laid on the table was $600 a month, "as per your previous employment terms". That 'previous employment' was an internship with a law firm, and the common understanding is that an internship pays less because students learn career related stuff during an internship. Here was an administrative job, which looked to have a hefty dose of data entry (the boringest, most tedious and most brainless office job imaginable) thrown in, and it was going for the same rate! This would average about $2-3 an hour, and upon my word, even a cheap job at a café would pay $4.50 at a minimum!
I wanted the job, but even that was a bit too hard to swallow. I tried to turn the conversation towards structuring the terms in an hourly rate, because if they had to offer an hourly rate the clear contrast between $6.50 and $2-3 would be most immediately apparent. Then this elderly guy told me that a fixed monthly rate would 'ensure greater security' which was absolute twigglesquash because the lady had earlier indicated that she wanted me to stay for a fixed term of three months so that all the training they gave would not be wasted. Fair enough, I had thought. But then why would I want the purported greater security of a (low) fixed monthly rate if I was going to stay for a fixed 3 months anyway?
Heaven help us, but that elderly guy was the most fitzwoggling hoodwinker I ever had the misfortune to come across. He tried to dazzle me with some outlandish notion that payment by the hour came with a greater expectation that would involve snagging a certain number of customers per day via telemarketing. Actually, one customer every two hours was the rate he came up with. I think he wanted to make it sound impossible, so that I would happily settle for the monthly rate, but I decided not to try to engage him on the reasonableness of those terms.
I realised that there was no compromise to be made in terms of pay. I was not paying $240 per month to stay in PGP for a fun vacation, or on some idealistic notion of gaining work experience that I need not worry about the bottom line. Business people have their own bottom lines, but this is no less true for (poor) working students who look for temporary jobs.
But in the wake of high indignation comes the sobering weight of many thoughts.
It is a moot point that the offer on those terms was an out-and-out scam, or attempted scam; the question is why they even wanted to take it this far.
There is a possibility that the low offer was a subtle indication that they did not want to hire me for lack of experience instead giving me the chance to reject it myself, but if that was so, they could have told me so straightaway, from the very outset. The fact that they took 4 hours to tell me that they would offer me $600 a month shows that they envisioned employing me, at least. There is also a possibility that they might have wanted to employ KM and not me, but telling me no directly would send the both of us off immediately. But this possibility is rejected for they could have told KM 'yes'’ immediately and me 'no' immediately, and left it up to the decisions of the both of us, as this what things would ultimately come down to.
So we are left with the conclusion that they wanted to employ me, and they wanted to employ me on those ridiculously low terms. The next question is why they wanted to do this, and why they even thought it was possible that I might accept such an offer. It is dreadfully hard to imagine pecuniary motives behind the decision of a media firm to undercut a temp worker some $300-400 a month-- it would hardly make a difference to their bottom line. There was lots of work flowing in and out and they were actively hiring several temp staff to help with the workload. Thus, they probably did not do this because they were hard up for money. Did they then do this because that lady, being a shrewd businesswoman, saw that I was a naive, innocent and inexperienced student and thought that this was a great opportunity to undercut someone who would probably take it very happily? Did she think that I was born yesterday? I wouldn’t put it pass her. As to how they thought it possible that I would take it sitting down, I have two surmises: 1) I had clearly written on the form that my previous pay was such an amount and maybe she thought that I had a really low threshold and would accept pay on such measly terms. On that matter, I later made it very clear to her that an internship was related to my studies and it was obtained through the school, two things that the offered job was not. 2) I had shown too much frank eagerness for the job and too enthusiastic a willingness to take it up and 'learn from the experience' and would thus be less concerned about the pay and could safely be offered what was clearly way below what she was prepared to pay. If this was a factor in her consideration, that is plainly despicable and borders on the fraudulent.
On this matter, I have two things to say: 1) I decline to be a fluffy white sheep and bleat contentedly while my hide is skinned off me. 2) May this and every such experience sink into my heart and form the bedrock of suspicion on which I shall judge all such situations in future.
KM tells me that various things that were said to her in her interview, as well as how she feels about that lady, as well as how I was treated, have combined to make the prospect of her own job rather distasteful to her. KM says the claustrophobic office environment also does not help matters. KM says that although the prospect of the pay and the steady job for 4 months is very welcome, she has no guarantee that they will treat her in good faith. KM later called them and rejected her own offer that had been left standing. KM is a darling and deserves three cheers and a hug.
"Fret not thyself because of evildoers, neither be thou envious against the workers of iniquity. For they shall soon be cut down like the grass, and wither as the green herb. Trust in the Lord, and do good; so shalt thou dwell in the land, and verily thou shalt be fed... Commit thy way unto the Lord, trust also in him; and he shall bring it to pass. And he shall bring forth thy righteousness as the light, and thy judgment as the noonday... Cease from anger and forsake wrath: fret not thyself in any wise to do evil... The wicked plotteth against the just, and gnasheth upon him with his teeth. The Lord shall laugh at him: for he seeth that his day is coming." Psalm 37:1-3, 5-6, 8, 12-13
