Grim thoughts
There are a bunch of people from an international panel to evaluate universities right here in the faculty these few days. And what is the most notable thing that they find about the students in the faculty? "Why don't your students speak up during lectures?" The professors can only shrug and look baffled. Some attribute it to the apathy of students, to lack of courage to speak up, to the general LT culture that seems to forbid speaking out of turn.
When I mull over this aspect of the Singaporean education, I wonder if students have been groomed since their primary days to be passive, acquiescent learning machines, to be receptive, but not responsive. Some people would rather chat on msn during lectures than to think of the lecture and on what they might want to ask the lecturer. But I must not be harsh: I am not a model of responsiveness myself, nor do I feel any compulsion to be, given the general 'dead' atmosphere of an LT and the accepted one-way flow of information. In fact, when once the lecturer tried to ask our opinion on why a statutory provision was so, only a handful of exchange students ventured to have a discusion with her, while the rest of us just zonked out. When I tried to follow the discussion, the myriad of conflicting information that was being produced by those students in the discussion hardly seemed relevant, although the lecturer praised each opinion enthusiastically. A cynical part of me wondered if this praise was just a strategy to encourage us to speak up, rather than because the opinions were of any substance whatsoever.
A young woman who came in to my year already having a postgraduate degree from elsewhere has left after just one year, and they tell me that it was because she found Singaporean students to be too apathetic. I personally liked her not only because she was warm and open and would be one of the few who would ask (interesting) questions during lecture, but she would enthusiastically participate in organising some faculty events like seminars and lunches and would earnestly try to get us involved. But inertia is a hard thing to go against and maybe she eventually decided that she would not go against the collective inertia in the student body anymore.
Not only do foreigners find this stifling, but even home grown Singaporean students cast around for a way out. I have a friend who is intent on gong for exchange, because she cannot stand the deadening atmosphere in school anymore. I did not previously mind so much the oppressiveness, but today I think that I can appreciate why she thinks this way.
Maybe we should just chalk it up to the Singaporean-Chinese mindset of playing things safe and not venturing from your comfort zone unless compelled to do so. Nobody seems prepared to change things, and you know what? even after complaining so much, I can't say that I feel a burning drive within me to revolutinise things. Even after criticising so bitterly, I will attend my next lecture and not make any greater effort to speak up than I did today. Tell me, what has gone wrong?
A senior was right when she said that after Year 1, students become jaded and cynical. I feel this inexorable transformation myself. Is there any need to fight it?
When I mull over this aspect of the Singaporean education, I wonder if students have been groomed since their primary days to be passive, acquiescent learning machines, to be receptive, but not responsive. Some people would rather chat on msn during lectures than to think of the lecture and on what they might want to ask the lecturer. But I must not be harsh: I am not a model of responsiveness myself, nor do I feel any compulsion to be, given the general 'dead' atmosphere of an LT and the accepted one-way flow of information. In fact, when once the lecturer tried to ask our opinion on why a statutory provision was so, only a handful of exchange students ventured to have a discusion with her, while the rest of us just zonked out. When I tried to follow the discussion, the myriad of conflicting information that was being produced by those students in the discussion hardly seemed relevant, although the lecturer praised each opinion enthusiastically. A cynical part of me wondered if this praise was just a strategy to encourage us to speak up, rather than because the opinions were of any substance whatsoever.
A young woman who came in to my year already having a postgraduate degree from elsewhere has left after just one year, and they tell me that it was because she found Singaporean students to be too apathetic. I personally liked her not only because she was warm and open and would be one of the few who would ask (interesting) questions during lecture, but she would enthusiastically participate in organising some faculty events like seminars and lunches and would earnestly try to get us involved. But inertia is a hard thing to go against and maybe she eventually decided that she would not go against the collective inertia in the student body anymore.
Not only do foreigners find this stifling, but even home grown Singaporean students cast around for a way out. I have a friend who is intent on gong for exchange, because she cannot stand the deadening atmosphere in school anymore. I did not previously mind so much the oppressiveness, but today I think that I can appreciate why she thinks this way.
Maybe we should just chalk it up to the Singaporean-Chinese mindset of playing things safe and not venturing from your comfort zone unless compelled to do so. Nobody seems prepared to change things, and you know what? even after complaining so much, I can't say that I feel a burning drive within me to revolutinise things. Even after criticising so bitterly, I will attend my next lecture and not make any greater effort to speak up than I did today. Tell me, what has gone wrong?
A senior was right when she said that after Year 1, students become jaded and cynical. I feel this inexorable transformation myself. Is there any need to fight it?
